Saturday, May 11, 2024

Zach Savich, momently

 

driveway globe

the conditions you need to think about the most make it impossible
have I loved it enough for it to be enough    here    where not even ruin
lasts

an ethics of deciding to see    considered meeting you at the station but
remembered the pleasure of finding another’s home in its instances the
music not cued but playing    the rain of blood was dung from passing
butterflies

forgot to send you the book read it myself again     as in a late sonata not
more beautiful for being late but late and more beautiful    and peace was
a wind from far through the house    the curtains would move from it
but to it the windows are bare

The latest from Philadelphia poet and editor Zach Savich is the poetry title momently (Boston MA: Black Ocean, 2024), following more than half a dozen prior poetry titles including The Orchard Green and Every Color (Oakland CA: Omnidawn, 2016) [see my review of such here]. “you could do worse    than write a poem to summon wind    or to read / one    and notice wind,” he writes, to close the poem “heights hardware.” The poems in Savich’s momently, none of which extend beyond a single page (although at least a couple are missing from the table of contents, oddly enough), extend into a kind of single lyric; a single, ongoing sentence across fifty pages, held in place through poem-titles, repetitions, threads. “I decide coffee alone will not heal me,” he writes, to open “proposal,” “is there sugar    I returned to / earth for coffee    I saw no need to forgive me    I had to do it and did / it nevertheless [.]” The poems extend, stretch out through the possible and towards the impossible; they move across and attend moments, small items set into a kind of ongoing and accumulative consequence or sequence. “harder to write myself a note,” he writes, to open the poem “luna pier,” “on the back of the eulogy    than the / eulogy    it take a long time to tune    and longer to trust [.]” There is an element of Savich’s poems here comparable to the lyrics of Canadian poet Phil Hall, curiously enough, although Savich’s sequence of hesitations and observations run more fluid than Hall’s comparatively-pointillist accumulations. “though sadly a faith in entropy only gets you so far,” Savich’s poem “showroom” begins, “because some things / do last    at least so far as we do [.]” Built as a rich tapestry of moments, this is a dreamy-scape of absolute specifics set across a very fine lyric.

Friday, May 10, 2024

Sylvia Legris, The Principle of Rapid Peering

My review of Saskatchewan poet Sylvia Legris' latest, The Principle of Rapid Peering (New York NY: New Directions, 2024), is now online at periodicites: a journal of poetry and poetics. See my review of her prior collection, Garden Physic (New Directions, 2021) here.

Thursday, May 09, 2024

12 or 20 (second series) questions with Tia McLennan

Tia McLennan’s (she/her) poetry has appeared in various Canadian literary journals including Riddle Fence, Vallum, Arc, CV2, Room, and Prairie Fire. In 2022, she won the NLCU Fresh Fish Award for her unpublished poetry manuscript. Her first book of poetry, Familiar Monsters of the Flood is forthcoming in April 2024 with Riddle Fence Publishing. She holds an interdisciplinary MFA in creative writing and visual art from UBC Okanagan, and a BFA from Nova Scotia College of Art and Design University. Originally from so-called Vancouver Island, B.C., (territory of the K’ómoks people), she gratefully resides in kalpilin (Pender Harbour), B.C. with her partner, their 6 year old son and a big cat named Basho.

1 - How did your first book change your life? How does your most recent work compare to your previous? How does it feel different?

As I write this, my first book has yet to be born (forthcoming in April 2024) so I can’t answer this question completely. Even so, having a soon-to-be book, there have already been some doors opened that weren’t before. I still haven’t fully adjusted to the idea that something I’ve been working on for so long in relative privacy will be out in the world and I’m curious to see how everything will unfold!

2 - How did you come to poetry first, as opposed to, say, fiction or non-fiction?

I was drawn to poetry early on…in Junior High and high school. I remember writing very young and wonderfully terrible poems. As a prize for getting a high mark in English Lit 12, my teacher gave me a copy of William Blake’s Songs of Innocence and of Experience. It was the first time I felt that deep magic of connecting with a poet through time and space and it kind of got me hooked. There’s a certain freedom in poetry—it can come in so many shapes and forms and is always evolving. I have a background as a visual artist and for me, visual art seems more closely related to poetry than other genres; I find the two speak to each other.  

3 - How long does it take to start any particular writing project? Does your writing initially come quickly, or is it a slow process? Do first drafts appear looking close to their final shape, or does your work come out of copious notes?

I don’t think I can properly answer this one yet, as I’ve only just started my second project. With my first project, it took me 2 or 3 years to realise I was writing a book, then another 12 years (including an MFA and much learning, starting, stopping, and revising) to finish it. There are a few poems that come out fully or almost fully-formed, but most come out of many notes, revisions, and edits.

4 - Where does a poem usually begin for you? Are you an author of short pieces that end up combining into a larger project, or are you working on a "book" from the very beginning?

My first book was certainly a case of many shorter pieces coming together into various poems and a complete manuscript over a long period of time. I have notebooks filled with fragments and thoughts, and these are usually the seeds that I grow into something more substantial. My second project that I’m currently working on has been a book from the beginning with an overarching theme—a new way of working for me, and it’s outside my comfort zone, a bit counter-intuitive.

5 - Are public readings part of or counter to your creative process? Are you the sort of writer who enjoys doing readings?

I do enjoy doing readings (even though I get pretty nervous). I like connecting with people and finding how the poem can subtly shift depending on how I read it and the tone of the room. During the creation phase, I don’t really think about readings. I do try to read my work out loud once in a while in order to properly hear the rhythm and sounds of a piece, but I don’t start thinking about sharing my work with an audience until it’s time for it to be published. So overall, I’d say it’s part of the process though not in an immediate or conscious way.  

6 - Do you have any theoretical concerns behind your writing? What kinds of questions are you trying to answer with your work? What do you even think the current questions are?

In my forthcoming book, there are quite a few questions and/or theoretical concerns that drive the poems. Certainly there is a mix of ecological grief, fear, and a touch of hope which I think is a common concern or question of our time. The human-ecological predicament that (at least for me) permeates the book is “can we come back from our current course toward ecological disaster?” I don’t know if anyone can really answer this. I think, increasingly, we’re realizing we live in a time of multiple crisis. I mean, our world has been watching a genocide be livestreamed and very little has been done to stop it. We’re also in a time when systems of oppression (such as colonialism) are being more openly questioned, resisted, or dismantled and I see this reflected through what many writers and artists are grappling with in various ways. On a more personal level, my book investigates my relationship with my father, his illness and passing, and ghosts of intergenerational trauma. The other concern that became central to the book was learning about maternal-fetal microchimera. This is the scientific term for the exchange of DNA through the placental barrier between the mother or birth parent and fetus. Essentially (as a birth parent) your unborn child’s cells take up residence in your body and are able to graft themselves into almost any organ and become physically part of you, giving you more than one set of DNA and essentially changing your body. The etymology comes from the Greek mythical monster known as the Chimera (a female hybrid monster with the head & body of a lion, a head of a goat and a tail that ended in a snake’s head). This exchange of cells happens even if there is no live birth. After I experienced six consecutive miscarriages, I became fascinated by the implications and unanswered questions in this scientific area, as well as in the medical language itself. I like how this phenomena undermines the idea of a singular, contained self. I also went down plenty of rabbit holes regarding the myth of the Chimera, and in our creation of modern-day “monsters”, and these concerns found their way into poems.

7 – What do you see the current role of the writer being in larger culture? Do they even have one? What do you think the role of the writer should be?

I don’t see writers having a singular role, but some possible roles or things that writers can do that come to mind are: to notice, pay attention, listen, reflect, resist, bear witness, restore, give voice to, challenge, entertain, celebrate. I also think a lot about being a writer (and a teacher) in this epoch where misinformation abounds, while AI (which steals from original creators) and Chat GTP rapidly change the communication landscape—so I’m curious to see how the role of writer will shift and adapt.

8 - Do you find the process of working with an outside editor difficult or essential (or both)?

So far, in my limited experience, it’s been essential and wonderful. The editors I’ve been lucky to work with have provided excellent insights and direction without being overbearing or insistent. Sometimes an editor will give feedback and it will totally ring true, but it means the poem has to fall apart and be rebuilt. This can be difficult, but has always resulted in a stronger piece of writing.

9 - What is the best piece of advice you've heard (not necessarily given to you directly)?

It was from a visual artist friend of mine and it was simply to continue. There’s usually plenty of rejection and can be a lot of interruption (especially as a parent) on the creative path. To find even small ways to continue and move forward is the advice I continue to give myself.

10 - What kind of writing routine do you tend to keep, or do you even have one? How does a typical day (for you) begin?

I have no real routine and wish I could be more disciplined in this department. I currently work as a teacher on call three days a week and have a couple of days dedicated to writing. I’m also a parent of a very active & freedom-loving almost 6-year-old, so life is busy. On my writing days, I drop my son off at school and then do my best to get at least 3-5 hours of writing/reading/research done. I often get side-tracked by gardening, house work and/or life admin tasks. If I’m working full time, there’s virtually no time to write and I rely on sporadic moments or once in a while stay up late to get some words down.

11 - When your writing gets stalled, where do you turn or return for (for lack of a better word) inspiration?

I think it’s important when I do truly feel stuck, to give the writing and myself a break from each other and I usually just read until I can catch the spark or impetus again. I’ll return to some writers that continue to be a compass for me (whether it’s poetry or other genres) and will often seek out new (to me) writers. Also, being in nature, moving my body, or having a visit with a good friend can all help shift my frame of mind.

12 - What fragrance reminds you of home?

Cedar, seaweed, fried onions and garlic, coffee.

13 - David W. McFadden once said that books come from books, but are there any other forms that influence your work, whether nature, music, science or visual art?

I totally agree to a certain extent. As a writer, I think I’ve learned the most about craft and voice through reading others’ work. So books remain the biggest influence and I love the object of them, but influences come from endless sources. We (or most of us) live in this constant deluge of information, which is both miraculous and nightmarish—this aspect of our world certainly influences my writing. Being out in nature and our view of and relationship to “nature” absolutely is something I question through my poems. My forthcoming book relies on found text from medical records, and I am interested in scientific language—its etymology and sounds. My background and schooling is in visual art and I find writing and art making are very much connected for me, not in the ekphrastic sense, but in how the two creative processes play off each other.

14 - What other writers or writings are important for your work, or simply your life outside of your work?

There are many! To name a few and in no particular order: Liz Howard, Tomas Tranströmer, William Blake, Natalie Diaz, C.D. Wright, Joan Didion, Joshua Whitehead, Seamus Heaney, Karen Solie, Jordan Abel, Adrienne Rich, Mary Ruefle, Sue Goyette’s Ocean, Alan Weisman’s The World Without Us, Brenda Shaughnessy, Ocean Vuong, Canisia Lubrin, Emily Dickinson, Tracy K. Smith’s Life on Mars, Louise Glück, Leah Horlick.

15 - What would you like to do that you haven't yet done?

There’s a long list that includes travel to distant lands. But my current daydream/obsession is to try and grow shiitake mushrooms on inoculated logs.

16 - If you could pick any other occupation to attempt, what would it be? Or, alternately, what do you think you would have ended up doing had you not been a writer?

Botanist, horticulturalist, gardener. I do currently have a job as a teacher, a profession I really love, but being paid to be outdoors with plants would be pretty dreamy.

17 - What made you write, as opposed to doing something else?

First I did something else. That is, I went to art school (Nova Scotia College of Art and Design) for my undergrad. I’d always written but never took it seriously. When my father was ill and after he passed, I had time to reflect and basically decided to turn my creative focus toward writing. My MFA from UBCO was interdisciplinary—in visual art and creative writing, though I ended up leaning more toward the creative writing. I still loosely keep up a visual art practice (drawing/painting/printmaking/collage), it’s still important to me, but writing became more essential, a more direct channel of expression.

18 - What was the last great book you read? What was the last great film?

Too hard to name just one! I read Ocean Vuong’s On Earth We’re Briefly Gorgeous in the past couple years and was incredibly moved. I’m currently immersed in (and in awe of) Canisia Lubrin’s Code Noir, Robin Wall Kimmerer’s Braiding Sweetgrass, and Danielle Vogel’s A Library of Light. I absolutely loved the film Everything Everywhere All at Once, directed by Daniel Kwan and Daniel Scheibert—it had me laughing so hard I was in tears.

19 - What are you currently working on?

I’m working on a hybrid book rooted in non-fiction, and memoir. It’s based on and from the place myself and my family have recently returned to live—Garden Bay, kalpílin (Pender Harbour), B.C., unceded territory of the shíshalh nation. This is where my father retired to in 2003, and then sadly passed away from cancer in 2006. I’m interested in the history (recent, colonial and pre-colonial), and want to pay specific attention to the capture and subsequent sale of half a pod of northern resident orcas from Garden Bay in 1969. Writing from a time and place of ongoing drought, I’m questioning and thinking about my (and our) relationship with the land and waters and wondering how we will navigate climate crisis and move toward a sustainable and just future.

12 or 20 (second series) questions;

Wednesday, May 08, 2024

Travis Sharp, Monoculture

 

in the distance, a man
            body flexing in labor
            standing so far from the combine
            he looks nearly of  size with it

 

              they’re plants, they’re
              people, they’re planted

                                    potted one
                        dutifully pruned
                                    new growth cut back

                        “to be fucked
                        in the fruits
                        of some labor”
                                    and in deep

                                    debt to the sun

The author of the full-length debut, Yes, I Am a Corpse Flower (Knife Fork Book, 2021) [see my review of such here], the poetry pamphlet Behind the Poet Reading Their Poem Is a Sign Saying Applause (Knife Fork Book, 2022) and the chapbooks Sinister Queer Agenda (above/ground press, 2018) and One Plus One Is Two Ones (Recreational Resources, 2018), the second full-length collection by American poet and editor Travis Sharp is Monoculture (Greensboro NC: Unicorn Press, 2024). Composed as a book-length lyric suite, I have to admit that, even beyond my enthusiasms for Sharp’s work, I’m already partial to any collection that opens with a quote by Denver poet Julie Carr, a quartet of lines pulled from 100 Notes on Violence (Ahsahta Press, 2010; Omnidawn, 2023): “Under the immense pleasure of conformity, I find myself / delivering // flower boxes with body parts // Under the immense comforting plane of conformity— [.]”

Sharp’s Monoculture works a collage-effect, weaving the elegy across American histories, including the interwoven histories of slavery and commerce, specifically the cotton industry, “(and how it’s still felt,” he writes, “encroachment of / overwhelm, even to this / day, today, it’s all too / much, there is danger / there, danger, there, it / comes up, again, / danger, there, and, this / throat, cottoning up, in / the face, of— // still—) [.]” Set as a book-length lyric suite, the poems of Monoculture are tethered together across the length and breadth of eighty pages, yet clustered into untitled groupings, each poem an untitled fragment that adds to an accumulation across (as the back cover offers) “the economic, social, racial, religious, and sexual dimensions of currency in America. Travis Sharp begins with cotton crops in the South and follows the tendrils of consequence wherever they lead: into the food we eat, the work we do, the prayers we pray—and into the hungers that are never sated, the work that is never done, the prayers that are never said.” The effect is accumulative, allowing one to open the book at any point and see the line stretching out across both directions, from the ending all the way back to the beginning, wrapping critical observation and archival material with the most beautiful music. “we live among the plants we love among the plants we graze among the plants we gaze / among the plants we thrive among the plants we dive among the plants we strive among the / plants we plead among the plants we please we please oh please among the plants [.]” Through the shape of this single narrative thread, this long, accumulative poem, Sharp questions and examines the implications of such supply chains, especially those underplayed, yet essential to both American development and growth, all the way back to those original foundations. As Sharp asks, mid-way through the collection: “and what does it mean to hold cotton / unformed by labor? and what does it mean / for the cotton unformed by labor to be the / product of labor? and what does it mean / that father child labored in those fields for / his own father who unlabored for rich men / to bag that cotton? and what does it mean / that after the beatings he came to pick / faster and faster, his arms slashing/ through the fields?”